Show HN: TwoTickets – meet through events, not swipes
2 by aammundi | 1 comments on Hacker News.
The idea for TwoTickets started when my wife and I had two tickets to Hamilton, and she couldn’t make it at the last minute. I realized how awkward it is to want to go to a concert, game, or show but not have someone to share it with — and how current apps either constrain you to your circle or to endless swiping. On TwoTickets, you Twoot an event in order to connect with others around that shared plan. The flow is simple: Twoot → Match → Chat → Decide → Go. You don’t see profiles or matches until you Twoot events, so plans come first and profiles second. The aim is to make meeting new people more natural: the event itself is the ice-breaker, not a random line in a bio. We’re in soft launch now and would love feedback from HN — does this “event-first” approach resonate with you, and where do you see the pitfalls? Paul Graham once said that all dating apps are really just matching apps. I wonder: how close is this to a solution to that assertion — although TwoTickets is broader than dating. *Links:* - Website: https://ift.tt/UEC1f0u - iOS App: https://ift.tt/cIQxngt...
Hack Nux
Watch the number of websites being hacked today, one by one on a page, increasing in real time.
New Show Hacker News story: Show HN: Listgitfiles.sh – Fetch Raw GitHub File URLs with One Command
Show HN: Listgitfiles.sh – Fetch Raw GitHub File URLs with One Command
2 by rmtbb | 0 comments on Hacker News.
I wrote this script to quickly retrieve raw file URLs from public GitHub repos. Added to my ~/.zshrc, it’s now a fast, reliable tool in my caveman workflow. Maybe you'll find use for it too! Have a great rest of your day, everyone!
2 by rmtbb | 0 comments on Hacker News.
I wrote this script to quickly retrieve raw file URLs from public GitHub repos. Added to my ~/.zshrc, it’s now a fast, reliable tool in my caveman workflow. Maybe you'll find use for it too! Have a great rest of your day, everyone!
New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: Why is ChatGPT worse now?
Ask HN: Why is ChatGPT worse now?
3 by nunocoracao | 3 comments on Hacker News.
Last month or so just been getting worse and worse results from chatgpt - quality went down... Claude on the other hand keeps surprising me. What's going on?
3 by nunocoracao | 3 comments on Hacker News.
Last month or so just been getting worse and worse results from chatgpt - quality went down... Claude on the other hand keeps surprising me. What's going on?
New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: If you were to start a business outside of tech, what would it be?
Ask HN: If you were to start a business outside of tech, what would it be?
6 by utkarsssh17 | 1 comments on Hacker News.
For those who’ve moved on or are thinking about life after a career in tech: what would you pursue next? Would you start a business, dive into a hobby, switch fields entirely, or just relax?
6 by utkarsssh17 | 1 comments on Hacker News.
For those who’ve moved on or are thinking about life after a career in tech: what would you pursue next? Would you start a business, dive into a hobby, switch fields entirely, or just relax?
New Show Hacker News story: Show HN: LightCycle, a FOSS game in Rust based on Tron
Show HN: LightCycle, a FOSS game in Rust based on Tron
5 by DavidCanHelp | 0 comments on Hacker News.
5 by DavidCanHelp | 0 comments on Hacker News.
New Show Hacker News story: Show HN: Davia – A community platform to build, share, and edit applications
Show HN: Davia – A community platform to build, share, and edit applications
4 by ruben-davia | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Hi HN! I'm Ruben, the founder of Davia ( https://davia.ai/ ). Davia is a platform to build, edit and share applications, where builders get rewarded based on usage while users can discover and reuse any app's code to fit their own needs. The problem we're trying to solve: Today's AI coding platforms charge you upfront for creation - it's like paying per block modification in no-code solutions. This works for commercial projects because you're aiming to generate revenue that exceeds your creation costs, but doesn't fit the reality of side projects and community apps that builders share for free. Most side projects require significant SEO effort and marketing to reach people who would actually find them useful, leaving creators with great apps but no discoverability. For users, when you need a specific tool for your project, you don't want to build it from scratch when someone has probably already created something similar. Our solution is a YouTube-style platform for apps where builders publish with open code so anyone can view, modify, and reuse applications. Unlike traditional platforms like GitHub (designed for developers as builders and users) or app stores (where code is closed and can't be modified), we focus on making apps accessible and customizable for everyone. We verify code quality and prevent spam to maintain platform standards. Builders get rewarded when their original apps are used as foundations for others' projects. Users discover apps, customize them for their needs, and build their own versions through reuse. They can either self-host or use our platform hosting, paying based on team usage when they scale to multiple users on our infrastructure. You can try it here: https://davia.ai/ . We'd love to hear from the HN community, whether you're a vibe-coder or curious about creator economics in the age of AI-assisted development!
4 by ruben-davia | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Hi HN! I'm Ruben, the founder of Davia ( https://davia.ai/ ). Davia is a platform to build, edit and share applications, where builders get rewarded based on usage while users can discover and reuse any app's code to fit their own needs. The problem we're trying to solve: Today's AI coding platforms charge you upfront for creation - it's like paying per block modification in no-code solutions. This works for commercial projects because you're aiming to generate revenue that exceeds your creation costs, but doesn't fit the reality of side projects and community apps that builders share for free. Most side projects require significant SEO effort and marketing to reach people who would actually find them useful, leaving creators with great apps but no discoverability. For users, when you need a specific tool for your project, you don't want to build it from scratch when someone has probably already created something similar. Our solution is a YouTube-style platform for apps where builders publish with open code so anyone can view, modify, and reuse applications. Unlike traditional platforms like GitHub (designed for developers as builders and users) or app stores (where code is closed and can't be modified), we focus on making apps accessible and customizable for everyone. We verify code quality and prevent spam to maintain platform standards. Builders get rewarded when their original apps are used as foundations for others' projects. Users discover apps, customize them for their needs, and build their own versions through reuse. They can either self-host or use our platform hosting, paying based on team usage when they scale to multiple users on our infrastructure. You can try it here: https://davia.ai/ . We'd love to hear from the HN community, whether you're a vibe-coder or curious about creator economics in the age of AI-assisted development!
New Show Hacker News story: Show HN: Provably secure vibe coding is now a thing
Show HN: Provably secure vibe coding is now a thing
4 by SaltNHash | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Don't get your knickers in a knot. We were surprised too. We are the team behind TideCloak which we shared on HN previously ( https://ift.tt/shr0Qpu ). This time we ran an experiment. What happens when you apply a fundamentally different security model to the worst possible development process? Behold... SecureAF https://ift.tt/tbs6ALX Build video 6 mins https://youtu.be/tx5MsJ3jeQw The code and UI are questionable and the quality assurance is non-existent. But the security model holds by treating even us as malicious, keeping authority over data out of reach for everyone except the rightful user. Can you actually use SecureAF? Hell no. We built it in 20 minutes and never tested it. What's wrong with you? What you reckon?
4 by SaltNHash | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Don't get your knickers in a knot. We were surprised too. We are the team behind TideCloak which we shared on HN previously ( https://ift.tt/shr0Qpu ). This time we ran an experiment. What happens when you apply a fundamentally different security model to the worst possible development process? Behold... SecureAF https://ift.tt/tbs6ALX Build video 6 mins https://youtu.be/tx5MsJ3jeQw The code and UI are questionable and the quality assurance is non-existent. But the security model holds by treating even us as malicious, keeping authority over data out of reach for everyone except the rightful user. Can you actually use SecureAF? Hell no. We built it in 20 minutes and never tested it. What's wrong with you? What you reckon?